Raising
Down rounds
A priced round cheaper than the last one — what happens to founders, employees and anti-dilution.
A down round is a priced equity financing where the price per share is lower than the previous round (equivalently: pre-money below the last post-money, adjusting for share count). Existing preferred holders typically have anti-dilution protection that gives them more as-converted shares. Common and employees absorb more of the dilution. Formulas live in anti-dilution.
Effects beyond math: employees compare "I joined at a $200M story" to an $80M round; options struck off the old 409A sit underwater; offers need larger grants or cash; the next raise is often easier after a clean reset than after fake flat terms nobody believes.
Walking through it
Setup, fully diluted:
| Holder | Shares | % before |
|---|---|---|
| Founders (common) | 6,000,000 | 60% |
| Employees (options + available) | 1,500,000 | 15% |
| Series A preferred | 2,500,000 | 25% |
| Total | 10,000,000 | 100% |
Series A was $4.00/share → post-money 10M × $4 = $40M. Series B raises $5M at $2.00/share. New Series B shares = $5M / $2 = 2,500,000.
Broad-based weighted average, using a simplified base A = 10,000,000 (your charter's "A" changes the cents):
CPA_old = $4.00
B = 5,000,000 / 4.00 = 1,250,000
C = 5,000,000 / 2.00 = 2,500,000
CPA_new ≈ 4.00 × (10,000,000 + 1,250,000) / (10,000,000 + 2,500,000)
≈ 4.00 × 11.25 / 12.50
≈ $3.60Series A conversion price falls from $4.00 to ~$3.60, so they receive additional as-converted shares in the ratio 4.00/3.60 ≈ 1.111× — about 11% more. Full ratchet would set CPA_new = $2.00 and roughly double Series A — far more punitive to common, and rare outside distressed deals.
Ignoring extra anti-dilution shares for a moment:
New total ≈ 10,000,000 + 2,500,000 = 12,500,000
Series B = 2,500,000 / 12,500,000 = 20%
Founders = 6,000,000 / 12,500,000 = 48% (were 60%)
Pool = 1,500,000 / 12,500,000 = 12% (were 15%)Add anti-dilution issuance and common shrinks further. Employees struck at a $4.00-related 409A may be out of the money versus a $2.00 round. The board may reprice or grant refreshers so retention does not collapse.
Example
An engineer owns 0.4% FD pre-round (40,000 / 10,000,000). Post-round on the simplified math: 40,000 / 12,500,000 = 0.32%, before anti-dilution. If anti-dilution issues another ~300k shares to Series A, total ≈ 12.8M and the stake is ~0.31%. The headline price/share fell 50%. Ownership % fell less than that. The paper value of common marked to the new primary price fell sharply.
Common mistakes
- Reading only the new investor's 20%. Anti-dilution takes more from common than that headline.
- Skipping a refresh for underwater grants. Survival with a hollow option plan is how people leave.
- Pretending a structured flat is kinder. Employees and the next lead still do the math. See structured rounds.
Check yourself
Price falls from $4.00 to $2.00 and the company sells $5M. About what does broad-based WA do to a $4.00 conversion price if A is 10M?
It moves it to about $3.60 — not all the way to $2.00.
An engineer was 0.4% on 10M shares. After 2.5M new shares, before anti-dilution, what is the stake?
40,000 / 12,500,000 = 0.32%.
Key takeaways
- A down round is a cheaper price per share than last time, not just "a hard raise."
- Weighted-average anti-dilution gives preferred extra as-converted shares; common funds that extra.
- Ownership % often falls less than the headline valuation story; paper value of common can fall a lot.
- Plan refresh or reprice if you want people to stay.
Further learning
Down rounds (Carta)carta.comRelated
Down rounds, bridges and venture debt
A map of flats, bridges, clean downs, recaps, debt and structured "flats" — what to do when the last price will not hold.
Anti-dilution protection
Extra conversion-price math for old preferred when a later round is cheaper — not ordinary new-money dilution.
Employee equity
Options vs RSUs, strike prices and 409A, vesting and exercise windows, and how to evaluate a startup offer with ownership math.